In 2010 seven key areas of electrical installation work were designated as high-risk in the Electricity Regulations and each of them had to be installed, tested, inspected and connected in accordance with standards cited specifically for them.
Typically, that meant complying with AS/NZS 3000 as well as a standard cited specifically for each area of high-risk prescribed electrical work.
Where any of these standards include requirements that are outside the scope of prescribed electrical work (PEW), confusion arises as to who is competent, responsible, or authorised to verify the safety and compliance of these additional requirements and what form should any attestation of safety and compliance take.
To address this, three years ago, electrical inspector Garry House called for the creation of new types of inspectors that could address electrical safety and also other matters in each cited standard that were critical for safety and conformance. (See ElectroLink, November 2016 issue, page 40)
House called for inspector competencies to be established in hazardous area safety that would include hazardous area assessment, electrical inspection and test certification along with knowledge of fire loadings, chemicals, ignition sources including mechanical, health and safety principles and risk assessment.
Today, he says, a similar approach needs to be applied for inspections relating to medical locations and patient treatment areas to manage not only electrical risks but non-electrical risks such as the signage and its location required by the standard.
From an electrical compliance standpoint, the issue is easy if you don’t read the regulations too closely.